For Reviewers

Each paper is reviewed by the editor and then sent to two independent referees for peer review. If
the article judged twice suitable, it will be published; If one review will be negative, the article is
sent to the third reviewer; The final decision will be notified authors by e-mail.
Papers can be submitted any time through the year.
Manuscript assessment Criteria:
Structure of the article; Acceptable/Needs improvement;
Keeping the rules of citation; Acceptable/needs improvement;
 Methodological justification and argumentation; Acceptable/Needs improvement;
 News and Contributions in the relevant field; Acceptable/Needs improvement;
Theoretical and practical results of the research. Acceptable/Needs improvement;

Translations assessment Criteria:

The Editor decides to publish the translations after consulting the editorial board  considering the following requirements:
The translation should meet the following criteria:

A. Translation  contributes to the spread of new knowledge;

b. Language meets the established standard;

C. Copyrights are properly reserved.

The journal strictly prohibits the use of artificial intelligence tools in the peer review process. Peer review is a scholarly activity that requires personal expertise, critical judgment, and ethical responsibility on the part of the reviewer. Accordingly, only the reviewer’s own professional knowledge and experience may be employed in conducting the review.