NOVEL CHALLENGES AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY: OBVIOUS PERPLEXITY AND HIDDEN ANSWERS

ანოტაცია

The text initially presents two cases, the first of which refers to the case of kidney donation, where the donor accepted payment for her donation, raising ethical concerns about commodifying the body. The second one involves a woman using her brother’s sperm and a paid egg donor to secure family inheritance rights. These examples illustrate how new biotechnologies redefine issues of birth, disease, and death, challenging long-held beliefs. Society—and the Church—must respond rapidly despite limited time for reflection. Three main attitudes emerge: rejecting modern changes, fully embracing them, or seeking a balanced
path that safeguards human dignity. Theological thought must confront its own limitations to remain relevant amid modern challenges. It must move beyond abstract theory and adapt its language to contemporary discussions of human nature, dignity, rights, and bioethical dilemmas. Tradition should not become rigid legalism but be creatively reinterpreted in light of new realities, as exemplified by early Christian thinkers. Orthodox theology is called to offer “good science,” broadening dialogue and addressing all dimensions of human existence, especially suffering. The Church must respond humbly and non-authoritatively, prioritizing
compassion over rules. Though no easy answers exist, its mission is preserved by courage, authenticity, and self-giving love.