DIGITAL-COMPUTER METHODS IN CRIMINALISTICS

Authors

  • Giorgi Dzindzibadze Ph.D. Candidate at Grigol Robakidze University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/lm.2024.08.01.06

Keywords:

Identification, Photo-Video, Dactyloscopy, Ballistics, Value of Evidence

Abstract

At the stage of investigation and consideration of the case in court, in order to identify criminals, great importance is attached to the identification of person, collection of evidence and research. The use of digital computer methods in forensic expertise is important and involves the entire system, from the crime scene to the court. These methods combine many capabilities which are the basis for better confrontation with new and evolving threats. On the other hand, these actions should be carried out without violating the fundamental principles of law, and on the other hand, research methodologies based on modern achievements of science should be used as much as possible. Advances in digital computer technology in criminalistic are mainly used for two purposes: for fixation and automated identification. During fixation using fixation means only for better depiction of traces and
other evidence. In the case of comparison systems, they reflect only approximate results about similar searched objects, which are finally checked by an expert and give a conclusion. According to the procedural legislation of the criminal law of Georgia, both the product obtained using the fixation means and the research results reflected in the expert document with the help of comparative systems are important for the investigation and the court, which means that they have the appropriate evidentiary value.
fixation, the crime scene, fact, object and traces are fixed, and during identification, the research objects are automatically being compared with each other. It is possible to intervene in the product created for the investigation and the court, which means that they have the appropriate evidentiary value.

References

Burrard G., The Identification of Firearms and Forensic Ballistics, New York, 1962

Cork D.L., Rolph J.E., Meieran E.S., Petrie C.V., Ballistic Imaging, Washington DC, 2008

Crime Scene Investigation, A Guide for Law Enforcement, National Forensic Science Technology Center, 2013

Crookes G.J., Elliott R., Hellenbach S,. Stamos M., Poole A., Bowen H., The Sharing of Ballistics Data across Europe and Neighbouring

Territories, Science & Justice, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2017

Dimaio V. J. M., Practical Aspects of Firearms, Ballistics, and Forensic Techniques, 3rd Ed., Boca Raton, 2016

Fisher B. A. J., Tilstone W. J., Woytowicz C., Introduction to Criminalistics, The Foundation of Forensic Science, Burlington, 2009

Girard J. E, Criminalistics, Forensic Science, Crime, and Terrorism, 3rd Ed., Washington DC, 2015

Gunther J. D., Gunther C. O., The Identification of Firearms, New York, 2015

Harris H. A., Lee H. C., Introduction to Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 2nd Ed., Boca Raton, 2019

Petrovic N., Stojicic S., Radovanovic R., Nikolic V., Petrovic M., Automated Fingerprint Identification System: With and Without the

Possibility of Correction of a Digitalised Image, Technical Gazette, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2022

Saferstein R., Criminalistics, An Introduction to Forensic Science, 13th Ed., New York, 2020

Saferstein R., Criminalistics, An Introduction to Forensic Science, 11th Edition, Upper Saddle River, 2015

Thompson R. M., Firearm Identification in the Forensic Science Laboratory, Alexandria, 2010

Travis J., Rau R. M., Crime Scene Investigation: A Guide for Law Enforcement, Washington DC, 2000

Published

2024-08-27

How to Cite

Dzindzibadze გ. (2024). DIGITAL-COMPUTER METHODS IN CRIMINALISTICS. JOURNAL "LEGAL METHODS&Quot;, 8(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.52340/lm.2024.08.01.06