Regional Trade Agreements and its Perspectives for Small Open Economies


  • Tamta Mikaberidze



Keywords: Regional Trade, Economic Integration, Export similarity, Georgia -CIS trade


Studying foreign trade issues and developing the right strategy plays a key role in reviving the country's economy. Generally, the countries are involved in these processes, both at the international and regional levels. The growth of both bilateral and multilateral regional trade agreements (RTA) includes the agreements between the countries at significantly different stages of development. To reveal these differences, RTA generally contains specific and different types of provisions aiming the benefits for less developed partners. At the same time, such agreements make it possible to select a partner from a political and strategic point of view.

The article discusses the importance and perspectives of regional trade through the prism of liberalization and historical experience, on Georgia - CIS example. Current trade flows with major partner countries are analyzed and the opportunities for diversity trade with other CIS trading partners are highlighted based on the intra-industry trade Index and the Finger-Kreinin Index. This analysis allows us to implement practical measures to increase the efficiency of external economic flows by identifying still unused reserves.


Dyker, D., Emerson, M.,Gasiorek, M., Holmes, P., Jungmittag, A., Korchagin, V., Maliszewska, M., Kudina, A., Pertaia, G., Polyakov, E., Roudoi, A., Tokmazishvili, M. (2008). Economic Feasibility, General Economic Impact and Implications of a Free Trade Agreement Between the European Union and Georgia. CASE Network Reports, No. 79., 08.2008, Center for Social and Economic Research on behalf of CASE Network 12 Sienkiewicza, 00-010 Warsaw, Poland.

Finger, J. M., Kreinin, M. E. (1979). A Measure of ‘Export Similarity’ and Its Possible Uses, Economic Journal, 89.

Grubel, H., Lloyd, P.J. (1971). Intra-Industry Trade, the Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. London: McMillan.

Heydon, K. (2008). Asymmetric integration: The role of regionalism. Developing countries and the WTO: Policy approaches, Samspon and Chambers (eds). United Nations University Press.

Heydon, K. (2003). Regionalism: A Complement, Not Substitute" . Regionalism and the Multilateral Trading System, 2003, Paris: OECD. pp.11-2.

Inventory of non-tariff provisions in Regional trade agreements. WTO, 5-May-1998, WT/REG/W/26.

Kreinin, M. E., Plummer, M. G. (2000). Economic Integration and Development: Has Regionalism Delivered for Developing Countries? Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Mikaberidze, T. (2017). The Role of Trade Technologies for Small Open Economics, Economics and Business. #3 (IX). ISSN 1987-5789.

Mikaberidze, T. (2016). Intra-Industry Trade trends of Georgia, Georgian Economics, (Apr27) e-ISSN 1512-29278.

Mikaberidze, T. (2015). New Forms and Trends of International Trade Amid the Global Crisis, In the proeedings: Strategica. Local versus Global. edited by Brătianu, C., Zbuchea, A., Pînzaru, F., Vătămănescu, E.-M. and Leon, R.D, Bucharest: Tritonic, ISBN 978-606-749-054-1, ISSN 2392-702X.

Pearson, C.S. (1994). The Asian Export ladder, in the book edited by Shpu-Chin Yang, Manufactured Exports of East Asian Industrialising Economies: Possible Regional Cooperation, Armonk, NY: M.E Sharpe, 35-51.

Pomfret, R. (1981). The Impact of EEC enlargement on non-member Mediterranean countries’ exports to EEC, Economic Journal, 91, 726-9.

Xinpeng, X., Ligang, S. (2000). Export Similarity and the pattern of east Asian development/ China in the Global Economy. Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA.

Global Economic Prospects 2005. Trade regionalism and Development. The World Bank. Wash., 2005,

Georgian National Statistics Office. Foreign Trade of Georgia. 2019.




How to Cite

Mikaberidze, T. . (2020). Regional Trade Agreements and its Perspectives for Small Open Economies. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1(1).